i know there are some of you out there who still subscribe to the 9-11 conspiracies. particularly the "it was a missile, not a plane, that hit the pentagon" one.
this may be something you've seen:
now, for your own good, listen to this:
a clip from Glenn Beck's interview with James Meigs of Popular Mechanics about debunking 9/11 myths
http://mfile.akamai.com/6713/wma/glennbeck.download.akamai.com/6713/preview/06/09/debunking911-clip.asx
and read these two articles:
"9-11 Review: ERROR: 'Eyewitnesses Saw a Small Plane'"
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/witnesses.html"Popular Mechanics: Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report"
http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html?page=1
1 comment:
I actually did a paper on the popular mechanics book "debunking 9/11 myths" a year or two ago. That was a pretty good little book, some of their points weren't supported as well as others, but it definitely dismissed the most ridiculous ones.
P.S. you should rename your blog "Daniel Hammond: Huckabee's number 1 fan"
Post a Comment